What people actually complained about, and what they kept.
These notes name the sitting. They are not star widgets. We asked former students to mention a chart, a rule, or a friction — traffic to Samaedam counts.
I used to move the stop after every upper wick on PTTGC because the shadow felt like the market had changed its mind. Kit made me wait for the daily close for six Tuesdays. I still hate sitting through a wick, but I stopped treating shadows as swings. The week-three homework was heavier than the confirmation email implied — two names, marked, with volume notes — and I did it on Sunday night after a full week at work.
I booked a Wednesday at 19:00 so I could mark the prior US daily close after work. Nalinee refused to discuss a fourth ticker when I tried to slide it in at minute eighty. We finished invalidation on the three names I actually hold. The recap arrived Thursday after the SET lunch break, which matched what she said she would do.
Saturday morning in Samaedam is a trek from Lat Phrao. I almost skipped. The shared pack used SET banks I do not trade, which annoyed me until Sunday’s clinic when they let me put my own transport name on the table. I did not get a buy instruction. I got a close below a line I had been pretending was still support.
The gap session in week five was the first time anyone in Bangkok had asked me to write, in advance, what I would do when a US name opened through my shelf while I was asleep. I still do not always follow my own note. At least the note exists. Kit will not send a morning list, which I knew from the first email and still found myself hoping for by week four.
Forty-five minutes, one stock, no theatre. Nalinee said wait for a daily close back above a level I had already broken on a closing basis. I did not add that week. The sitting felt short because I wanted her to bless the add. She would not.
A longer account: mixed book, week five
Helen M. joined the March intensive with two SET names and two US-listed holds. She already knew how to draw a trend line and arrived annoyed that we would not use hers in week one. By week four she had rewritten invalidation as a close on the SET names. The US names were the unfinished work: she was still waking for the European print and moving size before the New York close.
Week five’s gap sheet asked her to write three lines before the next incident. She wrote them. She did not always follow them. In her office-hours slot she brought a US name that had gapped through the shelf on an overnight notice. Kit spent the forty-five minutes on whether her share count still allowed her to wait for the US daily close, not on whether the notice was “priced in.” She left without a new trade. She says that still irritates her, and that she keeps the sheet on the fridge.
A longer account: workshop, then one review
Sorawit K. sat the June weekend because six Tuesdays collided with shift work. He disliked the shared Saturday pack — SET banks, which he does not trade — and said so at lunch. Sunday afternoon he put a transport name on the table. Nalinee marked a close that had already taken out a shelf he had been treating as living support. He booked a 45-minute review three weeks later on the same name after a bounce. The review said wait. He did not add. He wrote to us that the workshop was “useful and slightly insulting,” which we have left as the honest version.
We store your cookie choice on this device so the banner does not return every visit. Rejecting does not block the pages, the curriculum, or the enquiry form. Read the cookie note.
